Cemento-Ossifying fibroma - Did you know?
Cemento-ossifying fibroma (COF) previously called “Ossifying-fibroma” is a tumor where there is proliferation of cellular (fibroblasts) fibrous tissue along with calcifications in the form of basophilic spherical masses (cementum-like material) & immature bone (osteoid) (hence cemento-ossifying fibroma).
It is a true neoplasm, in that, it has a proliferative (growth) potential and can cause expansion of bone.
🤨 Did you know Oral Pathologists have classified this entity as a mesenchymal Odontogenic tumor?
After a lot of research and debate over the years, Oral Pathologists have classified this entity as a mesenchymal Odontogenic tumor! So much for being a lesion of the bone.
Well, lets not jump the gun. Ossifying fibroma has other variants called “trabecular juvenile ossifying fibroma” and “psammatoid juvenile ossifying fibroma”. These entities are very much fibro-osseous lesions!
💡Keratocystic odontogenic tumor (KCOT) has been reclassified too!
📝Recent updates on classification of Cemento-Ossifying fibroma
The most recent (2017) WHO classification considers ossifying fibroma (OF) in general to have three variants
COF, considered to be odontogenic in origin, and
Non-odontogenic variants called
Juvenile trabecular OF (JTOF),
Juvenile psammamatoid OF(JPOF).
I know things may be a little confusing here. The truth is, it actually is.
Reference
Cemento-osseous dysplasia versus cemento-ossifying fibroma
To add to the fuel, fibro-osseous lesions, especially cemento-osseous dysplasia (COD) and cemento-ossifying fibroma (COF) can be confusing topics for students, since there are so many overlapping/similar features as well as differences between the two. In fact we have a nice table enumerating the differences between the two. You could read it with our Revision Ninja - Oral Pathology and Medicine Course bundle!
📋Fun Question
A female patient was diagnosed with focal cemento-osseous dysplasia based on the clinical and radiographic features. After treatment of the lesion however, diagnosis was suspected to be cemento-ossifying fibroma and was sent for a microscopic analysis. As suspected the final diagnosis (after microscopy/histopathology) was cemento-ossifying fibroma. What made the surgeons suspect cemento-ossifying fibroma?
💡Remember that this scenario (question) is a contrived example to drive home a point, that being the intra-operative findings of the lesion.
🎥 A Preview Video!
Note: This video was made before the recent updates and classification of cemento-ossifying fibroma(COF). Otherwise the clinical features, radiology and histopathology for the lesion remain the same.
🔎You could dig deeper into the topic
In fact, we delve a lot more deeper into this topic in our cheatsheet/note -> Cemento-ossifying fibroma. We talk about,
Recent classification of Ossifying fibroma
Controversies with nomenclature and origin
Clinical, radiology and histopathology features
A note on the juvenile variants of Ossifying fibroma - Juvenile trabecular ossifying fibroma and Juvenile psammamatoid ossifying fibroma.
Key differences and similarities between Cemento-ossifying fibroma and Cemento-osseous dysplasia (dealt as a separate cheatsheet/table).
You could read in detail about Cemento-ossifying fibroma with our Revision Ninja - Oral Pathology and Medicine Course bundle!
💡Note
Apart from Notes, you could also get access to numerous MCQs and Videos with English captions/subtitles on various topics in Oral Pathology and Medicine.
📚Other study resources on HackDentistry!
And hey, by the way, please do give HackDentistry a shout-out to your friends and colleagues, would you? Would really appreciate it! Cheers and happy reading :)
Best
Team HackDentistry
Create your profile
Only paid subscribers can comment on this post
Check your email
For your security, we need to re-authenticate you.
Click the link we sent to , or click here to sign in.