Verrucous carcinoma's deceptive cousin!
Shear and Pindborb in 1980 reported lesions of the oral cavity that were clinically indistinguishable from verrucous carcinoma (VC) but showed slight differences under the microscope. They called them “Verrucous Hyperplasia” (VH).
In order to bring some uniformity in reporting this lesion, an expert group of Oral Pathologists held a consensus meeting in Malaysia in 2013. They formulated a set of clinico-pathologic features and proposed the term “Exophytic Verrucous Hyperplasia”.
VH mainly differentiates itself from VC in the absence of an endophytic growth of the epithelium. The broad rete ridges are rather in the same level as the adjacent normal epithelium and do not extend deep into the connective tissue unlike VC.
It has in fact been reported to be a distinct entity in the Indian population and pathologists consider it to be a potentially malignant disorder, though it has not been classified as one by the World Health Organization.
🔎You could dig deeper into the topic
In fact, you could delve a lot more deeper and read in detail about Verrucous Hyperplasia with our Revision Ninja - Oral Pathology and Medicine Course bundle!
💡Note
Apart from Notes, you could also get access to numerous MCQs and Videos with English captions/subtitles on various topics in Oral Pathology and Medicine.
Create your profile
Only paid subscribers can comment on this post
Check your email
For your security, we need to re-authenticate you.
Click the link we sent to , or click here to sign in.